As a developer of anti-counterfeiting materials for 15 years, I am often asked, “Why can supermarket cashiers use ultraviolet pens to quickly determine the authenticity of banknotes?” The answer lies in the anti-counterfeiting ink technology we will discuss today. Through this article, you will learn:
- the working principles of the six main types of anti-counterfeiting inks
- how to quickly determine authenticity with the naked eye and simple tools
- the latest breakthroughs in rare earth fluorescent materials
I. The technological code of anti-counterfeiting inks
Quick answer: UV monomers and oligomers are usually chosen by viscosity, adhesion, flexibility, shrinkage, and cure speed as a package. The most reliable formulas come from balancing those properties rather than maximizing only one.
1.1 The double-edged game of photosensitive technology
I remember that in 2018, when we had a technical exchange with the Swiss National Bank, they showed me an anti-counterfeiting upgrade for the euro that really impressed me – the same banknote uses both **short-wave (254nm) and long-wave (365nm)** ultraviolet excitation technology. This design means that counterfeiters need to break through both fluorescent systems at the same time, and the cost of counterfeiting has soared by 83% (according to INTERPOL 2022 data).
Comparison of mainstream photosensitive technologies:
- Ultraviolet fluorescent ink: cost only $0.02/cm², recognition rate 98.7%
- Infrared ink: mostly used in passport chips, requires special equipment to read
- Photochromic ink: Japanese JIS standard requires color difference ΔE ≥ 5.0
1.2 Rare earth materials break the game
Pain points of traditional fluorescent materials:
✓ Organic type is prone to aging (37% attenuation in half a year)
✓ Non-organic models have excessive toxicity (lead content > 300ppm)
✓ Solvent-based models pollute the environment (VOC emissions exceed the standard by 4 times)
Our rare earth europium complexes developed in 2021 have broken through the triple technical bottleneck:
- Fluorescence lifetime extended to 2.3ms (traditional material 0.8ms)
- Quantum efficiency of 89% (industry average 62%)
- Achieved application in water-based systems (reduction of solvent usage by 70%)
2. Smart choices in action
2.1 The golden balance between cost and effect
Advice for small and medium-sized enterprises:
- Food packaging: choose thermal ink (detection cost <$50)
- Drug labels: recommend chemical encryption ink (acid-base development)
- High-end goods: must use three-band fluorescent combination
![Comparison of anti-counterfeiting ink application scenarios]center]alt text=“Guide to selecting anti-counterfeiting solutions for different industries” keywords=“anti-counterfeiting ink application, ultraviolet fluorescence, thermal ink”]
2.2 My hard-won lesson
A case of anti-counterfeiting failure for a liquor brand in 2016:
- Mistake: using organic fluorescent ink alone
- Result: 40% of the labels faded after 3 months
- Improvement plan: combination of rare earth complexes and microtext
3. Future trends and innovative opportunities
3.1 A new era of smart anti-counterfeiting
AI-responsive ink being tested by our team:
- Features: mobile phone flashlight to stimulate specific spectra
- Advantages: real-time network verification (error rate 0.0001%)
- Cost: 25% lower than traditional solutions
3.2 An environmental revolution is underway
Latest breakthrough:
- Water-based rare earth ink has passed REACH certification
- Light curing system reduces energy consumption by 60
- COD value of printing wastewater < 50 mg/L
Personal insight:
I remember that in the anti-counterfeiting campaign in China, we successfully located the underground factory by analyzing the fluorescence decay curve of the counterfeit ink (a 15% decrease within 0.5 seconds). This has inspired us: dynamic anti-counterfeiting features will be the main battlefield in the next decade.
Interactive question:
What is the most ingenious anti-counterfeiting design you have seen in your daily life? Feel free to leave a comment and share your observations!
(1) Reference formula for UV fluorescent ink
Acrylic copolymer solution (MAA/MMA/EA/BA solid content 45%) 132
Tetraethylene glycol diacrylate 40
Photoinitiator 369 3
Fluorescent pigment 140
Low-melting point glass binder 3
Butanone 3
(2) Reference formula for UV security ink
EA 100
TPGDA 9
TMPTA 6
Other diluents 30~35
6512 5
Diphenylamine 0.3
Rare earth fluorescent complexes 1~3
A practical sourcing and formulation view of UV monomers and oligomers
Most successful UV formulations are built by choosing the backbone first and then tuning the reactive monomer package around the substrate, cure method, and end-use stress. That usually produces a more stable result than choosing materials by viscosity or price alone.
- Start from the final property target: hardness, flexibility, adhesion, and shrinkage rarely point to exactly the same raw-material package.
- Screen the reactive package as a whole: oligomer, monomer, and photoinitiator choices interact strongly in UV systems.
- Use viscosity as a tool, not the only decision rule: the easiest-processing material is not always the one that performs best after cure.
- Check the real substrate: plastic, metal, label film, gel systems, and coatings can reward very different polarity and cure-density balances.
Recommended product references
- CHLUMICRYL IBOA: A strong low-viscosity monomer reference when hardness and good flow both matter.
- CHLUMICRYL HPMA: Useful when more polarity and adhesion support are needed in the reactive package.
- CHLUMICRYL TMPTA: A standard reactive monomer benchmark when stronger crosslink density is required.
- CHLUMICRYL EO3-TMPTA: Helpful when viscosity and cure behavior need to be tuned around the base package.
FAQ for buyers and formulators
Can one UV monomer or resin solve every formulation problem?
Usually no. Commercially strong formulas depend on how several components work together to balance cure, adhesion, flow, and durability.
Why should monomers be screened together with oligomers?
Because monomers can change viscosity, cure rate, shrinkage, and substrate behavior enough to alter the final ranking of the same backbone resin.
Contact Us Now!
If you need Price and Sample Testing, please fill in your contact information in the form below, we will usually contact you within 24 hours. You could also email me info@longchangchemical.com during working hours ( 8:30 am to 6:00 pm UTC+8 Mon.~Sat. ) or use the website live chat to get prompt reply.
| Polythiol/Polymercaptan | ||
| DMES Monomer | Bis(2-mercaptoethyl) sulfide | 3570-55-6 |
| DMPT Monomer | THIOCURE DMPT | 131538-00-6 |
| PETMP Monomer | 7575-23-7 | |
| PM839 Monomer | Polyoxy(methyl-1,2-ethanediyl) | 72244-98-5 |
| Monofunctional Monomer | ||
| HEMA Monomer | 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate | 868-77-9 |
| HPMA Monomer | 2-Hydroxypropyl methacrylate | 27813-02-1 |
| THFA Monomer | Tetrahydrofurfuryl acrylate | 2399-48-6 |
| HDCPA Monomer | Hydrogenated dicyclopentenyl acrylate | 79637-74-4 |
| DCPMA Monomer | Dihydrodicyclopentadienyl methacrylate | 30798-39-1 |
| DCPA Monomer | Dihydrodicyclopentadienyl Acrylate | 12542-30-2 |
| DCPEMA Monomer | Dicyclopentenyloxyethyl Methacrylate | 68586-19-6 |
| DCPEOA Monomer | Dicyclopentenyloxyethyl Acrylate | 65983-31-5 |
| NP-4EA Monomer | (4) ethoxylated nonylphenol | 50974-47-5 |
| LA Monomer | Lauryl acrylate / Dodecyl acrylate | 2156-97-0 |
| THFMA Monomer | Tetrahydrofurfuryl methacrylate | 2455-24-5 |
| PHEA Monomer | 2-PHENOXYETHYL ACRYLATE | 48145-04-6 |
| LMA Monomer | Lauryl methacrylate | 142-90-5 |
| IDA Monomer | Isodecyl acrylate | 1330-61-6 |
| IBOMA Monomer | Isobornyl methacrylate | 7534-94-3 |
| IBOA Monomer | Isobornyl acrylate | 5888-33-5 |
| EOEOEA Monomer | 2-(2-Ethoxyethoxy)ethyl acrylate | 7328-17-8 |
| Multifunctional monomer | ||
| DPHA Monomer | 29570-58-9 | |
| DI-TMPTA Monomer | DI(TRIMETHYLOLPROPANE) TETRAACRYLATE | 94108-97-1 |
| Acrylamide monomer | ||
| ACMO Monomer | 4-acryloylmorpholine | 5117-12-4 |
| Di-functional Monomer | ||
| PEGDMA Monomer | Poly(ethylene glycol) dimethacrylate | 25852-47-5 |
| TPGDA Monomer | Tripropylene glycol diacrylate | 42978-66-5 |
| TEGDMA Monomer | Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate | 109-16-0 |
| PO2-NPGDA Monomer | Propoxylate neopentylene glycol diacrylate | 84170-74-1 |
| PEGDA Monomer | Polyethylene Glycol Diacrylate | 26570-48-9 |
| PDDA Monomer | Phthalate diethylene glycol diacrylate | |
| NPGDA Monomer | Neopentyl glycol diacrylate | 2223-82-7 |
| HDDA Monomer | Hexamethylene Diacrylate | 13048-33-4 |
| EO4-BPADA Monomer | ETHOXYLATED (4) BISPHENOL A DIACRYLATE | 64401-02-1 |
| EO10-BPADA Monomer | ETHOXYLATED (10) BISPHENOL A DIACRYLATE | 64401-02-1 |
| EGDMA Monomer | Ethylene glycol dimethacrylate | 97-90-5 |
| DPGDA Monomer | Dipropylene Glycol Dienoate | 57472-68-1 |
| Bis-GMA Monomer | Bisphenol A Glycidyl Methacrylate | 1565-94-2 |
| Trifunctional Monomer | ||
| TMPTMA Monomer | Trimethylolpropane trimethacrylate | 3290-92-4 |
| TMPTA Monomer | Trimethylolpropane triacrylate | 15625-89-5 |
| PETA Monomer | 3524-68-3 | |
| GPTA ( G3POTA ) Monomer | GLYCERYL PROPOXY TRIACRYLATE | 52408-84-1 |
| EO3-TMPTA Monomer | Ethoxylated trimethylolpropane triacrylate | 28961-43-5 |
| Photoresist Monomer | ||
| IPAMA Monomer | 2-isopropyl-2-adamantyl methacrylate | 297156-50-4 |
| ECPMA Monomer | 1-Ethylcyclopentyl Methacrylate | 266308-58-1 |
| ADAMA Monomer | 1-Adamantyl Methacrylate | 16887-36-8 |
| Methacrylates monomer | ||
| TBAEMA Monomer | 2-(Tert-butylamino)ethyl methacrylate | 3775-90-4 |
| NBMA Monomer | n-Butyl methacrylate | 97-88-1 |
| MEMA Monomer | 2-Methoxyethyl Methacrylate | 6976-93-8 |
| i-BMA Monomer | Isobutyl methacrylate | 97-86-9 |
| EHMA Monomer | 2-Ethylhexyl methacrylate | 688-84-6 |
| EGDMP Monomer | Ethylene glycol Bis(3-mercaptopropionate) | 22504-50-3 |
| EEMA Monomer | 2-ethoxyethyl 2-methylprop-2-enoate | 2370-63-0 |
| DMAEMA Monomer | N,M-Dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate | 2867-47-2 |
| DEAM Monomer | Diethylaminoethyl methacrylate | 105-16-8 |
| CHMA Monomer | Cyclohexyl methacrylate | 101-43-9 |
| BZMA Monomer | Benzyl methacrylate | 2495-37-6 |
| BDDMP Monomer | 1,4-Butanediol Di(3-mercaptopropionate) | 92140-97-1 |
| BDDMA Monomer | 1,4-Butanedioldimethacrylate | 2082-81-7 |
| AMA Monomer | Allyl methacrylate | 96-05-9 |
| AAEM Monomer | Acetylacetoxyethyl methacrylate | 21282-97-3 |
| Acrylates Monomer | ||
| IBA Monomer | Isobutyl acrylate | 106-63-8 |
| EMA Monomer | Ethyl methacrylate | 97-63-2 |
| DMAEA Monomer | Dimethylaminoethyl acrylate | 2439-35-2 |
| DEAEA Monomer | 2-(diethylamino)ethyl prop-2-enoate | 2426-54-2 |
| CHA Monomer | cyclohexyl prop-2-enoate | 3066-71-5 |
| BZA Monomer | benzyl prop-2-enoate | 2495-35-4 |