How to Choose Additives for Architectural Coatings

14. Juli 2026
Veröffentlicht in Uncategorized
14. Juli 2026 marketing@longchang-Gruppe

Schnelle Antwort: Käufer, die Zusatzstoffe auswählen Architekturbeschichtungen usually get a better first shortlist when they stop asking for one all-purpose additive and instead separate three different jobs. CHLUMICRYL® DP-D200R should move first when the main pressure is Pigmentdispersion, Viskositätsreduzierung, oder Herstellung einer organischen Bentonit-Suspension in a route Longchang already recommends for Architekturbeschichtungen. CHLUMICRYL® WD-D547 belongs earlier when the coating line is being limited by Substratbenetzung, Antikrater, Neubeschichtung, or a broader paint-system wetting problem. CHLUMIAG® 3367 verdient eine frühere Überprüfung, wenn der Käufer eine benötigt compatibility-first leveling route that can also sit inside water-based, solvent, UV, or resin-modification decision paths.

That is the commercially useful split. Architectural coating buyers do not usually fail because they forgot to add an additive. They fail because they ask one additive to solve grind rheology, Substratbenetzungund final film leveling gleichzeitig.

Why this page deserves to exist

Longchang already has broader function pages for dispersants, Netzmittelund Nivellierungsadditive, plus the wider cluster overview for CHLUMICRYL® Beschichtungs- und DruckfarbenadditiveDiese Seiten helfen Käufern bei der Entscheidung. which additive family belongs in the discussion.

This page answers the next B2B question: which additive route should architectural coatings buyers screen first when the issue is no longer generic, but tied to dispersion, wetting, or final appearance control?

That is a distinct page type. It is an application page, not just another single-function page, and it helps route readers into the right product path faster.

What architectural coating buyers are usually trying to fix

In practical architectural coating work, the first bottleneck usually lands in one of these lanes:

  • the grind is too viscous, the pigment package is slow to develop, or the formulator needs cleaner handling for organic-bentonite slurries
  • the coating is not wetting the surface cleanly, or the line is seeing cratering, recoating sensitivity, or poor spreading
  • the coating wets but still does not level the way the buyer wants, especially when the project needs broader compatibility across more than one formulation style

That is also consistent with general industry practice. Architectural coatings teams usually separate dispersion and grind control, surface wetting and defect suppressionund film appearance / leveling before they lock the first additive shortlist. The specific product facts below come from Longchang-supported product pages and related company-controlled comparison content.

Quick comparison table: which route solves what first?

Kaufkriterium DP-D200R WD-D547 CHLUMIAG® 3367
Main first-screen job Pigment dispersion, viscosity reduction, bentonite-slurry efficiency Wetting, anti-cratering, recoating, spreading, and broad system wetting control Compatibility-first leveling and broader formulation flexibility
System language supported by Longchang Systeme auf Lösungsmittelbasis Wasserbasierte Farben, lösemittelhaltige und lösemittelfreie Farben, UV-härtende Farben UV-, lösungsmittel- und wasserbasierte Systeme
Strongest supported fit for this page Especially recommended for architectural, industrial, and anti-corrosion coatings Useful when the architectural coating issue is really wetting plus anti-cratering or recoating pressure Useful when architectural coating buyers need a broader leveling route rather than a narrow single-system answer
Key supported strengths Excellent dispersion efficiency, viscosity reduction, high gloss, enhanced color intensity, increased transparency and hiding power Excellent wetting and spreading, anti-cratering, recoating, defoaming, and leveling support Cross-system compatibility, resin-modification flexibility, and broader addition-path options
Wichtiger Beobachtungspunkt Do not confuse it with a final-film leveling or wetting additive Transparency-in-varnish score is lower than some narrower wetting routes, so appearance-sensitive clear systems should still be tested carefully Compatibility is prioritized, so buyers should still validate whether the final surface feel or appearance is refined enough for the target project

When DP-D200R is the better fit

DP-D200R should move to the front when the real architectural-coating problem starts before application, inside the grind or slurry stage. Longchang supports it with ausgezeichnete Dispersionseffizienz und Viskositätsreduzierung, then adds application-side value through Hochglanz, erhöhte Farbintensitätund erhöhte Transparenz und Verschleierung der Macht. Longchang also says it is sehr gut geeignet zur Herstellung von organischen Bentonitsuspensionen und ist besonders empfehlenswert für Architekturanstriche, Industrieanstriche und Korrosionsschutzsysteme.

That makes DP-D200R the stronger first route when:

  • the architectural coating formula is losing time in Pigmentdispersion rather than in final drawdown appearance
  • the formulator needs Viskositätsreduzierung before deciding whether the surface package is actually the main problem
  • Herstellung einer organischen Bentonit-Suspension is part of the process window
  • the buyer wants a company-supported route already positioned for architectural coating systems

In short, DP-D200R is the earlier choice when the buyer is still fixing the foundation of the grind, not just the look of the top film.

When WD-D547 is the better fit

WD-D547 belongs earlier when the architectural coating is already dispersed reasonably well, but the applied film is still showing a wetting or surface-defect problem. Longchang supports WD-D547 across water-borne paint, solvent and solvent-free paintund UV-cure paint. The same company-supported route also adds good anti-cratering, re-coating, entschäumendund Nivellierung support alongside ausgezeichnete Benetzungs- und Ausbreitungseigenschaften.

That makes WD-D547 the better first route when:

  • the architectural coating issue is really about schlechte Substratbenetzung oder surface spread
  • the buyer is seeing craters or other wetting-related surface defects
  • recoating performance is still part of the commercial decision
  • the lab needs one wetting route that can travel across more than one paint-system boundary

WD-D547 is not the same kind of tool as DP-D200R. It is not the first route for grind viscosity. It is the first route for buyers who already suspect the architectural coating is failing at the surface interface.

Wann CHLUMIAG® 3367 die bessere Wahl ist

CHLUMIAG® 3367 deserves earlier review when the job is less about fixing a single obvious defect and more about finding a leveling route with broader compatibility. Longchang positions it across UV-, lösungsmittel- und wasserbasierte Systeme, and company-supported comparison content places it in architectural-coating selection when buyers need a route that can also move through Harzmodifizierung or broader formulation work. Longchang also supports addition flexibility, including use together with the Polyol während der Polyurethan-Präpolymerisation or later addition depending on the route.

That makes 3367 the stronger first move when:

  • the architectural coating already wets acceptably but the buyer still wants better final leveling compatibility
  • the project spans water-based, solvent, or UV-adjacent development work
  • the formulator wants one route that can sit inside broader compatibility or resin-modification logic
  • the buyer is not looking for the narrowest specialty additive first, but for a Kompatibilitätsorientierter Benchmark

This is why 3367 is commercially useful on an architectural-coatings page. Many buyers are not solving one dramatic defect. They are trying to keep appearance acceptable across a wider formulation window.

Wie Käufer vor der Anforderung von Mustern auswählen sollten

1. Decide whether the bottleneck is in the grind or on the surface

If the main pain point is viscosity, pigment development, or bentonite-slurry handling, start with DP-D200R. If the main pain point only appears after application as wetting or crater behavior, move earlier to WD-D547. If wetting is acceptable and the remaining issue is broader flow and leveling compatibility, 3367 becomes more logical.

2. Do not ask one additive to solve three different stages

Dispersion additives, wetting additives, and leveling additives can interact inside one formula, but they should not be screened as if they solve the same first problem. Architectural coating projects often get cleaner faster when the first additive screen is tied to the stage where the defect actually starts.

3. Die Systemgrenze sichtbar halten

DP-D200R is positioned in Lösungsmittelbasierte Systeme. WD-D547 spans wasserbasierte, lösemittelhaltige, lösemittelfreie und UV-härtende Lacke. 3367 supports a broad UV-, lösungsmittel- und wasserbasiert compatibility story. That boundary matters before dosage comparisons matter.

4. Use architectural-coating language the right way

Architectural coatings is a real end-use bucket, but the right additive route still depends on whether the buyer is working on the pigment package, the surface-wetting package, or the final appearance package. That is the difference between a useful application page and a vague catch-all article.

5. Build the internal shortlist deliberately

Für viele Käufer ist die sauberste erste Runde eine dispersion-led route, eins Benetzungsgeführte Routeund eins leveling-led route. That usually teaches more than screening three products from the same additive family.

Empfohlene Route nach Longchang von dieser Seite

FAQ

Which additive should architectural coating buyers test first when the grind is too thick?

Usually DP-D200R, because Longchang directly supports it for dispersion efficiency, viscosity reduction, and organic-bentonite slurry preparation, and explicitly recommends it for architectural coating systems.

When should WD-D547 move ahead of DP-D200R?

WD-D547 should move ahead when the pigment package is no longer the main bottleneck and the applied architectural coating is failing on wetting, anti-cratering, recoating, or spreading behavior.

Why would CHLUMIAG® 3367 be chosen before a narrower leveling additive?

Because some architectural coating buyers need a compatibility-first leveling route that can stay workable across broader formulation paths instead of solving only one narrow defect in one narrow system.

Can one of these three products replace the other two?

No. They belong to different first-screen jobs. DP-D200R is a dispersion route, WD-D547 is a wetting and surface-defect route, and 3367 is a leveling and compatibility route.

What is the fastest way to shorten the additive shortlist?

Define whether the problem starts in the grind, on the substrate interface, or in the final film appearance. That usually shows which route deserves the first sample round.

Need a tighter architectural-coatings shortlist?

If your team is stuck between grind viscosity, surface wetting, and final leveling, do not keep searching for one additive that promises everything. Split the problem by stage first. That usually makes the CHLUMICRYL® route much easier to sample, validate, and move toward inquiry.

Kontakt US

German